SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE

Course Code	Course Name	Year	Semester	Theoretical	Practical	Credit	ECTS
60731METOS-MIM0517	Mimarlığın Güncel Problematikleri	4	Fall	2	2	3	5

Course Type :	Elective Course I
Cycle:	Bachelor      TQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree      QF-EHEA:First Cycle      EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree
Language of Instruction:	Turkish
Prerequisities and Co-requisities:	N/A
Mode of Delivery:	Face to face
Name of Coordinator:	Profesör Dr. HİKMET TANSEL BİLGİN
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı:
Dersin Kategorisi:	Programme Specific

SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE

Course Objectives & Content

Course Objectives:
Course Content:

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) are those describing the knowledge, skills and competencies that students are expected to achieve upon successful completion of the course. In this context, Course Learning Outcomes defined for this course unit are as follows:

Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.)

1) Günümüz mimarlık pratiği ve disiplinindeki gelişmeleri ve güncel problemlerin teorik temellerini anlama.

Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.)

1) Seminer ve logbook çalışmaları aracılığıyla teorik bilgileri pratikle birleştirerek, güncel sorunlara yönelik çözüm odaklı düşünme ve tasarım geliştirme becerisi.

Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.)

1) Öğrencilerin güncel mimarlık problemleri ile ilgili yeni bilgiler edinme, araştırma yapma ve öğrenme süreçlerini geliştirmeleri.

2) Mimarlık disiplinine özgü güncel meseleleri anlama ve bu meseleler doğrultusunda tasarım, analiz ve çözüm geliştirme becerisi.

Weekly Course Schedule

Week	Subject	Materials Sharing *
		Related Preparation	Further Study

*These fields provides students with course materials for their pre- and further study before and after the course delivered.

Recommended or Required Reading & Other Learning Resources/Tools

Course Notes / Textbooks:

References:

GENÇ, N., & YILMAZ, G. (2024). Deprem sonrası rehabilitasyon sürecinde geçici rekreasyon alanlarının önemi. International Journal of Holistic Health, Sport and Recreation, 3(1), 17-38. Kavaklı, B. (2022). Türkiye'de farklı bölgelerde uygulanan deprem sonrası geçici konut sistemlerini değerlendirme yaklaşımı (Yüksek lisans tezi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü). Ö. D. Aksoyak. (2023). Deprem sonrası orta vade tedbirleri kapsamında ahşap strüktürlü geliştirici konut önerisi. In Deprem (pp. 79-84). Tasarım Rehberleri Araştırma Geliştirme ve Uygulama Derneği. Büyüköztürk, E., & Oral, M. (2024). Kalıcı deprem konutlarında kullanıcı memnuniyeti analizi: Osmaniye örneği. Artium, 12(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.51664/artium.1366233 Uzuner, E., & Akıncıtürk, N. (2024). Deprem sonrası konut tercihlerinde kullanıcı bilincinin değerlendirilmesi: Gölcük/Değirmendere örneği. (Yüksek lisans tezi, Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı). Süzer, A., & Yamaçlı, R. (2024). Afet sonrası sürdürülebilir geçici konut tasarımı, analiz ve öneriler. YDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 68-85. Kartal, M. E., Kaya, Ç. M., & Yavuz, F. (2024). Ege denizi depremi sonrası barınma çözümleri: Acil, geçici ve kalıcı barınma yaklaşımları. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 7(2), 560-571. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1386500 Akbay Arama, Z., Dalyan, İ., & Akın, M. S. (2023). Konut binalarının enkazından ortaya çıkan plastik atıkların yol dolgularının iyileştirilmesinde kullanımı. 9th Geotechnical Symposium, 22-24 Kasım 2023, İstanbul. Altınışık, C. (2007). Adapazarı kalıcı deprem konut alanlarının peyzaj tasarımı açısından irdelenmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı). Işık Üniversitesi. (2023, March 1). Deprem sonrası barınma: Geçmiş deneyimlerden öğrenmek. YouTube. https://youtu.be/DG9GU-bL3Fs.

Level of Contribution of the Course to PLOs

No Effect	1 Lowest	2 Low	3 Average	4 High	5 Highest

	Programme Learning Outcomes	Contribution Level (from 1 to 5)
1)	Uses and applies theoretical, factual and applied sciences for the solution of architectural problems in line with user requirements in the context of history, art, culture, environment, human and technology.
2)	Analyzes, models, evaluates architectural design and construction projects; designs and develops models to meet spesific requirements under realistic constraints and conditions. For this purpose, it selects and uses appropriate methods, tools and technologies.
3)	Has knowledge of the sustainable architecture, conservation of the cultural heritage and the conservation of the natural environment
4)	Has knowledge of technical issues such as building materials, structural engineering, structural systems, environmental control, service systems and the relationship between mentioned issues and architectural design
5)	S/he acquires the competencies that develop in line with the expectations of business world and the society defined as the institutional outcomes of our university on the basic level in relation with his/her field.
6)	Has knowledge of architectural professional practice, develops strategical, innovative and entrepreneurial ideas.
7)	Uses different representation methods and tools to transfer his/her design thoughts
8)	Knows the ethical approaches required for the professional judgments in social, ecological and cultural factors in architectural design and construction.
9)	Takes responsibility for considering public interest, respecting historical, cultural and natural resources and improving the quality of life

SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE

Teaching & Learning Methods of the Course

(All teaching and learning methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)

Teaching and Learning Methods defined at the Programme Level	Teaching and Learning Methods Defined for the Course
Lectures
Discussion
Problem Solving
Reading
Homework
Project Preparation
Seminar
Course Conference
Questions Answers
Active Participation in Class

Assessment & Evaluation Methods of the Course

(All assessment and evaluation methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)

Aassessment and evaluation Methods defined at the Programme Level	Assessment and Evaluation Methods defined for the Course
Midterm
Presentation
Final Exam
Homework Evaluation
Jury Evaluation

Contribution of Assesment & Evalution Activities to Final Grade of the Course

Measurement and Evaluation Methods	# of practice per semester	Level of Contribution
Presentation	1	% 20.00
Midterms	1	% 20.00
Semester Final Exam	1	% 50.00
Active Participation in Class	1	% 10.00
Total		% 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK		% 50
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK		% 50
Total		% 100

SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE