HOME INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATIONINFORMATION ON DEGREE PROGRAMMES Public Relations and AdvertisingCERTIFICATE PROGRAMMESUSEFUL INFORMATION, RESOURCES & SERVICES FOR STUDENTSUSEFUL LINKS AND DOCUMENTSADITIONAL & SUPPORTING INFORMATION

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE

Course Code Course Name Year Semester Theoretical Practical Credit ECTS
60213TATOS-ILT0566 Psychogeography and Photography 3 Spring 2 2 3 4
Course Type : Departmental Elective
Cycle: Bachelor      TQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree      QF-EHEA:First Cycle      EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree
Language of Instruction: Turkish
Prerequisities and Co-requisities: N/A
Mode of Delivery: Face to face
Name of Coordinator: Doçent Dr. ÇEYİZ MAKAL FAİRCLOUGH
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı:




Dersin Kategorisi: Programme Specific

SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE

Course Objectives & Content

Course Objectives: the course aims to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of how psychogeography and photography intersect, enabling them to critically engage with urban environments and creatively express their interpretations through visual storytelling and photographic documentation.
Course Content: The content of this course is designed to provide a balanced exploration of both theoretical concepts in psychogeography and practical skills in photography, allowing students to develop a deep understanding of how urban environments can be interpreted and represented through visual storytelling.

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) are those describing the knowledge, skills and competencies that students are expected to achieve upon successful completion of the course. In this context, Course Learning Outcomes defined for this course unit are as follows:
Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.)
Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.)
  1) It is designed to enable students to gain a comprehensive understanding of psychogeography and photography and to equip them with the knowledge, skills and ethical awareness necessary to creatively and critically interpret and represent urban environments through visual media.
Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.)

Weekly Course Schedule

Week Subject
Materials Sharing *
Related Preparation Further Study
1) Introduction to Psychogeography and PhotographyDefinitions and historical development of psychogeography and photography. Overview of key theorists and practitioners.
2) Psychogeography Concepts
3) Saha Gezisi / Muze Ziyareti
4) field trip
5) The Urban Environment as Subject Techniques of urban exploration and their relevance to psychogeography.
6) Photography as Spatial Narrative Photography as a medium for storytelling and exploration of urban narratives. Analyze photographic essays and projects focused on urban environments.
7) Midterm Projects and Presentations
8) Memory and Identity in Urban Spaces The role of memory and identity in shaping perceptions of urban spaces.
9) field trip / soundscape walk
10) Weekly assignments (photographic documentation, reflections).
11) Ethics: Discuss ethical considerations related to urban exploration and photography, such as privacy and consent.
12) Field Trips:urban explorations.
13) in class discussions and critiques
14) Final project and presentation evaluation
*These fields provides students with course materials for their pre- and further study before and after the course delivered.

Recommended or Required Reading & Other Learning Resources/Tools

Course Notes / Textbooks: Dersin temel ders notları için ana başlıklar:
Psikocoğrafya: Temel Kavramlar ve Tarihçe
Flâneur (Gezgin)
Dérive: Psikocoğrafik yürüyüşler
Psiko-mekansal ilişkiler
Guy Debord ve Sürrealist Fotoğrafçılar
Guy Debord'un Sürrealist yürüyüşleri üzerine çalışmaları ve kentsel fotoğrafçılıkla ilişkisi.
Örnek fotoğrafçılar: Robert Frank, Bernd ve Hilla Becher, Martin Parr gibi sanatçılar ve onların şehir fotoğrafçılığına katkıları.
Guy Debord – La Société du Spectacle (Gösteri Toplumu) (1967)
Kevin Lynch – The Image of the City (Şehrin İmajı) (1960)
Walter Benjamin – The Arcades Project (Arcades Projesi) (1982)
Michel de Certeau – The Practice of Everyday Life (Gündelik Yaşamın Pratiği) (1984
Susan Sontag – On Photography (Fotoğraf Üzerine) (1977)
References: Fotoğrafın Temel Prensipleri - Özer Kanburoğlu
Bir Fotoğrafı Anlamak - John Berger
Fotoğrafçılar İçin Eleştirel Kuram - Ashley La Grange
Doğada Fotoğrafı Görmek-Tarık Yurtgezer
Yürümenin Felsefesi - Frederic Gros
Yürümek - Henry David Thoreau
KAYBOLMA KILAVUZU- Rebecca Solnit
Susan Sontag – On Photography (Fotoğraf Üzerine) (1977)
Walter Benjamin – The Arcades Project (Arcades Projesi) (1982)

SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs)

(The matrix below shows how the course learning outcomes (CLOs) associates with programme learning outcomes (both KPLOs & SPLOs) and, if exist, the level of quantitative contribution to them.)

Relationship Between CLOs & PLOs

(KPLOs and SPLOs are the abbreviations for Key & Sub- Programme Learning Outcomes, respectively. )
CLOs/PLOs KPLO 1 KPLO 2 KPLO 3 KPLO 4 KPLO 5
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
CLO1

Level of Contribution of the Course to PLOs

No Effect 1 Lowest 2 Low 3 Average 4 High 5 Highest
           
Programme Learning Outcomes Contribution Level (from 1 to 5)
1) He/She comprehends communication in all aspects.
2) He/She follows the developments in our country and the world.
3) To apply the theoretical and conceptual information for the field of Public Relations and Advertising.
4) Applies the theoretical knowledge in business life during a semester.
5) S/he acquires the competencies that develop by the expectations of business world and the society defined as the institutional outcomes of our university on the advanced level in relation with his/her field.

SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE

Teaching & Learning Methods of the Course

(All teaching and learning methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)
Teaching and Learning Methods defined at the Programme Level
Teaching and Learning Methods Defined for the Course
Lectures
Discussion
Case Study
Problem Solving
Demonstration
Views
Laboratory
Reading
Homework
Project Preparation
Thesis Preparation
Peer Education
Seminar
Technical Visit
Course Conference
Brain Storming
Questions Answers
Individual and Group Work
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
Active Participation in Class

Assessment & Evaluation Methods of the Course

(All assessment and evaluation methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)
Aassessment and evaluation Methods defined at the Programme Level
Assessment and Evaluation Methods defined for the Course
Midterm
Presentation
Final Exam
Quiz
Report Evaluation
Homework Evaluation
Oral Exam
Thesis Defense
Jury Evaluation
Practice Exam
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
Active Participation in Class
Participation in Discussions

Relationship Between CLOs & Teaching-Learning, Assesment-Evaluation Methods of the Course

(The matrix below shows the teaching-learning and assessment-evaluation methods designated for the course unit in relation to the course learning outcomes.)
LEARNING & TEACHING METHODS
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
ASSESMENT & EVALUATION METHODS
CLO1
-Lectures -Midterm
-Discussion -Presentation
-Case Study -Final Exam
-Problem Solving -Quiz
-Demonstration -Report Evaluation
-Views -Homework Evaluation
-Laboratory -Oral Exam
-Reading -Thesis Defense
-Homework -Jury Evaluation
-Project Preparation -Practice Exam
-Thesis Preparation -Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
-Peer Education -Active Participation in Class
-Seminar - Participation in Discussions
-Technical Visit
-Course Conference
-Brain Storming
-Questions Answers
-Individual and Group Work
-Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
-Active Participation in Class

Contribution of Assesment & Evalution Activities to Final Grade of the Course

Measurement and Evaluation Methods # of practice per semester Level of Contribution
Homework Assignments 2 % 20.00
Midterms 1 % 30.00
Semester Final Exam 1 % 50.00
Total % 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK % 50
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK % 50
Total % 100

SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE