SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE

Course Code	Course Name	Year	Semester	Theoretical	Practical	Credit	ECTS
60731METOZ-MIM0124	History of Architecture II	2	Spring	2	2	3	5

Course Type :	Compulsory
Cycle:	Bachelor      TQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree      QF-EHEA:First Cycle      EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree
Language of Instruction:	Turkish
Prerequisities and Co-requisities:	N/A
Mode of Delivery:	Face to face
Name of Coordinator:	Dr. Öğr. Üyesi ESRA GİRGİN
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı:	Dr. Öğr. Üyesi ESRA GİRGİN
Dersin Kategorisi:

SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE

Course Objectives & Content

Course Objectives:	To provide students with the knowledge and skills to analyze and evaluate the reflections of historical processes on architecture.
Course Content:	Westernization in Ottoman Architecture and examination of the architectural process in Turkey after 1923.

Course Specific Rules

You must come to class on time. Assignments should be prepared in accordance with the required requirements and submitted on time. COVID-19 Precautions: In face-to-face classes, it is mandatory to use a mask with the mouth and nose closed. Social distancing should be observed during the lesson. Food, Beverage and Tobacco Products: Within the scope of COVID-19, eating and drinking is not allowed during the lesson in face-to-face studio classes. Tobacco products cannot be used in the classroom.

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) are those describing the knowledge, skills and competencies that students are expected to achieve upon successful completion of the course. In this context, Course Learning Outcomes defined for this course unit are as follows:

Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.)

1) Knows the pioneering architecture movements of 19th century and 20th century.

2) Has knowledge about the effect of technological changes in architecture.

Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.)

1) Analyze and evaluate pioneer architects in 19th century and 20th century.

Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.)

1) Understands and evaluates the results of different theoretical situations and their structured forms.

2) Understand and evaluate different social and cultural programs and their reflections on architecture.

Weekly Course Schedule

Week	Subject	Materials Sharing *
		Related Preparation	Further Study
1)	Getting to know, explaining the purpose and scope of the course, sharing resources WESTERNIZATION PROCESS IN OTTOMAN ARCHITECTURE
2)	OTTOMAN ARCHITECTURE IN THE 17TH CENTURY
3)	OTTOMAN ARCHITECTURE AND WESTERNIZATION IN THE 18TH CENTURY
4)	OTTOMAN ARCHITECTURE IN THE PROCESS OF WESTERNIZATION Architecture in Europe in the 18th and 19th Centuries European Influence in Ottoman Architecture
5)	OTTOMAN ARCHITECTURE IN THE PROCESS OF WESTERNIZATION First National Architectural Period New Building Programs in the Westernization Process
6)	CITY MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING IN THE PROCESS OF WESTERNIZATION City Management Urban Planning
7)	Midterm Exam
8)	Midterm Exam
9)	ARCHITECTURE IN TURKEY IN THE PERIOD 1923-50 Modernity and Modern Architecture First National Architecture period until 1927
10)	THE FIRST PERIOD OF MODERN ARCHITECTURE IN TURKEY BETWEEN 1927-1939 The First Phase of Modern Architecture (1927-1933) – The Period of Foreign Architects The Second Phase of Modern Architecture (1933-1937 / 38) - The Period of Native Architects Third Phase of Modern Architecture (1937-1939)
11)	SECOND NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE PERIOD BETWEEN 1939-1950
12)	ARCHITECTURE IN TURKEY AFTER 1950 THE NEW POST-WAR PERIOD AND THE MODERNISM OF THE 1950S
13)	ARCHITECTURE IN TURKEY IN THE PLULARITY PERIOD BETWEEN 1960-1980 Architectural Trends in the Period 1960-1980 Architectural Approaches After 1980 Building Programs and Examples
14)	Project Presentation
15)	SEMESTER FINAL EXAM

*These fields provides students with course materials for their pre- and further study before and after the course delivered.

Recommended or Required Reading & Other Learning Resources/Tools

Course Notes / Textbooks:

References:

Ahmad, F. (1968). The Young Turk Revolution, Journal of Contemporary History, Cilt.3, Sayı. 3, The Middle East, S.19-36. Akın, N. (1998). 19. Yüzyılın İkinci yarısında Galata ve Pera, Literatür Yayıncılık, İstanbul Aktepe, M. (1958). Patrona İsyanı, 1730. İstanbul. Akyavaş, B. (1993). Yirmisekiz Mehmet Efendi’nin Fransa Sefaretnamesi. Türk Kültürünü Araştırma Enstitüsü, Ankara. Angel, A. (1987). Henri Prost ve İstanbul’un İlk Nazım Planı. Mimarlık, Sayı 1, S. 34-39. Artan. T. (1993). From Charismatic Leadership to Collective Rule. Dünü ve Bugünüyle Toplum ve Ekonomi, Sayı. 4, S. 53-94. Aslanapa, O. (1984). Türk Sanatı. Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul. Aslanoğlu, İ. (2010). Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi Mimarlığı 1923-1938. Bilge Kültür Sanat, İstanbul. Boyacıoğlu, D. (2010). Arap Hanı ve Yapının 18.-19. Yüzyıl İstanbul Hanları İçindeki Yeri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 15, Sayı 2, S.9-21. Cansever, T. ( 1993). İstanbul Planlamasında Geçmiş ve Gelecek-Ülke Ölçeğinde İstanbul’u Planlamak. İstanbul, Sayı. 4, S. 48-59. Cezar, M. (1971). Sanatta Batıya Açılış ve Osman Hamdi, Türkiye İş Bankası Yayını, İstanbul Cezar, M. (1983), Typical Commercial Buildings of the Ottoman Classical Period and the Ottoman Construction System. Türkiye İş Bankası, İstanbul. Cezar, M. (1987). Müzeci ve Ressam Osman Hamdi Bey. Türk Kültürüne Hizmet Vakfı, İstanbul. Clark, E.C. (1974). The Ottoman Industrial Revolution. International Journal of Middle East Studies. Cilt. 5, Sayı.. 1, S.65-76. Crane, H. (1987). Risale-i Mimariye: An EarlySeventeenth Century Ottoman Treatise on Architecture. E.J. Brill, Leiden. elik, Z. (1984). Bouvard’s Boulevards: BeauxArts Planning in İstanbul. The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Cilt. 43, Sayı. 4, S. 341-355. k, Z. (1986). The Remaking of IstanbulPortrait of an Ottoman City in the 19th Century. University of Washinton Press, Seeatle, A.B.D. Denel, S. (1982). Batılılaşma Sürecinde İstanbul’da Tasarım ve Dış Mekanlarda Değişim ve Nedenleri. ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi, Ara Yayınları, Ankara. Duranay, N. (1972). Cumhuriyetten bu yana İstanbul Planlaması. Mimarlık, Sayı 7, S. 65- 109. Duymaz, A. Ş. ( 2003). II. Abdülhamid Dönemi İmar Faaliyetleri. Doktora tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Isparta. Düzbakar, Ö. (2009). XV-XVIII. Yüzyıllarda Osmanlı Devleti’nde Elçilik Geleneği ve Elçi İaşelerinin Karşılanmasında Bursa’nın Yeri. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. Cilt 2, Sayı.6, S. 182-194. Evren, B. (1994) Galata Köprüleri Tarihi. Milliyet Yayınları, İstanbul. Goodwin, G. (1987). A History of Ottoman Architecture. Thames and Hudson, Londra. Hamadeh, S. (2004). Ottoman Expressions of Early Modernity and the “Inevitable” Question of Westernization. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Cilt. 63, Sayı. 1, S. 32-51. Kuban, D. (2007). Osmanlı Mimarisi. Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları, İstanbul. Kuban, D. (2009). Çağlar Boyunca Türkiye Sanatının Anahatları. Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul. Lewis, B. (1968). The Emergency of Modern Turkey. Oxford University Press, Londra. Melling, M. (1969). Voyage Pittoresque de Constantinople et des Rivers du Bosphore. Yapı Kredi Bankası, İstanbul. Nayır, Z. (1975). Osmanlı Mimarlığında Sultan Ahmed Külliyesi ve Sonrası, 1609-1690, Doktora Tezi, İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi, İstanbul. Necipoğlu, G. (2007), 15. ve 16. Yüzyılda Topkapı Sarayı: Mimari, Tören ve İktidar. Çev. Ruşen Sezer, Yapı Kredi Kültür ve Sanat Yayıncılık, İstanbul. Ortaylı, İ. (1987). İmparatorluğun en Uzun Yüzyılı. Hil Yayın, İstanbul. Özaslan, N. (1995). Historic Urban Fabric: Source of Inspiration for Contemporary City Form. Doktora Tezi, York Üniversitesi, York, İngiltere. Rosenthal, S. (1980). The Politics of Dependency – Urban Reform in İstanbul. Greenwood Press, Connecticut ve Londra. Sey, Y. (1984). To House the New Citizens: Housing Policies and Mass Housing. Modern Turkish Architecture. Ed. R. Holod, A. Evin. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, S.153-177. Sözen, M. (1975), Türk Mimarisinin Gelişimi ve Mimar Sinan, Türkiye İş Bankası Yayını, İstanbul. Tekeli, İ. (1993). 1839-1980 Arasında İstanbul’un Planlama Deneyimleri-İcabında Plan, İstanbul, Sayı 4, S. 26-37. Tekeli, İ. (2007). Türkiye’de Mimarlığın Gelişiminin Toplumsal Bağlamı, Modern Türk Mimarlığı, Ed. R. Holod, A. Evin, S. Özkan. Mimarlar Odası, Ankara, S.13-36. Turan, Ş. (1963). Osmanlı Teşkilatında Hassa Mimarları. A.Ü.D.T.C. Fakültesi, Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi. Cilt 1, Sayı 1, S. 157- Turan, Ş. (1963). Osmanlı Teşkilatında Hassa Mimarları. A.Ü.D.T.C. Fakültesi, Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi. Cilt 1, Sayı 1, S. 157- 202. Walsh, R. (1989). Constantinople and the Scenery of the Seven Churches of Asia Minor. Fisher, Son ve Co., Londra ve Paris. Yavuz, Y. & S. Özkan (2007). Ulusal Bir İfade Bulmak: Birinci Ulusal Üslup, Modern Türk Mimarlığı. Ed. R. Holod, A. Evin, S. Özkan. Mimarlar Odası, Ankara, S. 53-68. Yıldıran, N. (1993). Dış Borçlanmada 33 yıllık Birliktelik ve Doğu-Batı Ekseninde bir İkiz Bina: Tütün Rejisi ve Bank-ı Osmani-i Şahane. Osman Hamdi Bey ve Dönemi, Ed. Z. Rona, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, İstanbul, S.41-53.

SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs)

(The matrix below shows how the course learning outcomes (CLOs) associates with programme learning outcomes (both KPLOs & SPLOs) and, if exist, the level of quantitative contribution to them.)

Relationship Between CLOs & PLOs

(KPLOs and SPLOs are the abbreviations for Key & Sub- Programme Learning Outcomes, respectively. )

CLOs/PLOs	KPLO 1							KPLO 2				KPLO 3													KPLO 4				KPLO 5
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
CLO1
CLO2
CLO3
CLO4
CLO5

Level of Contribution of the Course to PLOs

No Effect	1 Lowest	2 Low	3 Average	4 High	5 Highest

	Programme Learning Outcomes	Contribution Level (from 1 to 5)
1)	Uses and applies theoretical, factual and applied sciences for the solution of architectural problems in line with user requirements in the context of history, art, culture, environment, human and technology.	5
	1.1 Has knowledge of the determination of architectural design requirements, design processes and methods, aesthetic and cultural dimension, sustainability and natural environment, construction technologies and construction management, design tools and technologies
	1.2 Has theoretical and conceptual knowledge in the field of architecture; has historical and cultural knowledge of world architecture and vernacular architecture	5
	1.3 Has knowledge of the sustainable architecture, conservation of the cultural heritage and the conservation of the natural environment	5
	1.4 Has knowledge of technical issues such as building materials, structural engineering, structural systems, environmental control, service systems and the relationship between mentioned issues and architectural design
	1.5 Has knowledge of construction economics and management, and their effects on built environmental design
	1.6 Has knowledge of architectural professional practice
	1.7 Has knowledge of tools for design, modeling, planning, construction management based on information technologies in the field of architecture
2)	Analyzes, models, evaluates architectural design and construction projects; designs and develops models to meet spesific requirements under realistic constraints and conditions. For this purpose, it selects and uses appropriate methods, tools and technologies.
	2.1 Analyzes and evaluates architectural design and construction applications to meet certain requirements, creates architectural project under realistic constraints and conditions
	2.2 Develops creative, innovative and sustainable architectural design ideas by using the knowledge of architecture and design and by considering aesthetic and cultural dimension, conservation of the natural and built environment
	2.3 Makes a decision on site selection and settlement in built environment applications; integrates architectural design with technical design, building service systems design and environmental design; prepares building construction project; organizes and manages the design and construction processes; for this purpose, s/he works in cooperation with multidisciplinary teams.
	2.4 Selects and uses modern methods, techniques and tools for design, modeling, planning, construction management based on information technologies required for architecture applications
3)	Owns the competencies required by the constantly developing field of architecture and the global competitive environment.	4
	3.1 Works effectively individually and in multi-disciplinary teams, takes responsibility with cooperation and leadership skills
	3.2 Queries, describes abstract thoughts, evaluates opposing views and examines the results with similar criteria.
	3.3 Considers the environmental, social and aesthetic sensibilities of the society
	3.4 Develops design strategies and methods for information production in interdisciplinary studies
	3.5 Has awareness of the necessity of lifelong learning
	3.6 Reads, writes, describes the ideas according to the purpose
	3.7 Uses different representation methods and tools to transfer his/her design thoughts
	3.8 Uses information technologies and at least one computer software (European Computer Driving License Advanced Level) interactively
	3.9 Takes responsibility for considering public interest, respecting historical, cultural and natural resources and improving the quality of life	4
	3.10 Knows the ethical approaches required for the professional judgments in social, political and cultural factors in architectural design and construction.
	3.11 Knows the role of pre-professional practice in professional development and the mutual rights and responsibilities of the employer and intern
	3.12 Has architectural conservation awareness, environmental awareness and ethical responsibility	5
	3.13 Has awareness of entrepreneurship and innovativeness issues
4)	Applies the theoretical knowledge in business life during a semester.
	4.1 Experiences all processes in business life.
	4.2 Takes part in activities related to the field of education in a business operating in the field.
	4.3 Questions the application with theoretical knowledge.
	4.4 Compiles the knowledge and experience gained in the field.
5)	S/he acquires the competencies that develop in line with the expectations of business world and the society defined as the institutional outcomes of our university on the basic level in relation with his/her field.	3
	5.1 Acquires competency of analyzing and solving the problems.
	5.2 Participates as a team member and takes responsibility in the environments that require the solving of the conflicts and acts as a leader when necessary.
	5.3 Has awareness for ethical and social responsivity.
	5.4 By supporting the learnt courses with quantitative and qualitative data; and by using verbal and visual communication means, s/he transfers them to the groups within and outside his/her group in a systematical and effective way.	3
	5.5 Evaluates the norms and standards present in the works in which s/he takes responsibility in a critical point of view.
	5.6 Develops strategical, innovative and entrepreneurial ideas.
	5.7 Acquires competence of managing the change.
	5.8 Shows development personally and socially with and awareness for lifelong learning.
	5.9 Follows advanced technologies and developments about digital transformation.
	5.10 Has cultural awareness and s/he transfers this to the groups within and outside his/her field.	3
	5.11 Has awareness about citizenship competency.
	5.12 Acquires communication in a Foreign Language (English) competence defined on the level of at least B1 in European Language Portfolio. (In programs whose medium of instruction is English, on the level of B2/B2+).

SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE

Teaching & Learning Methods of the Course

(All teaching and learning methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)

Teaching and Learning Methods defined at the Programme Level	Teaching and Learning Methods Defined for the Course
Lectures
Discussion
Case Study
Problem Solving
Demonstration
Views
Laboratory
Reading
Homework
Project Preparation
Thesis Preparation
Peer Education
Seminar
Technical Visit
Course Conference
Brain Storming
Questions Answers
Individual and Group Work
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
Active Participation in Class

Assessment & Evaluation Methods of the Course

(All assessment and evaluation methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)

Aassessment and evaluation Methods defined at the Programme Level	Assessment and Evaluation Methods defined for the Course
Midterm
Presentation
Final Exam
Quiz
Report Evaluation
Homework Evaluation
Oral Exam
Thesis Defense
Jury Evaluation
Practice Exam
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
Active Participation in Class
Participation in Discussions

Relationship Between CLOs & Teaching-Learning, Assesment-Evaluation Methods of the Course

(The matrix below shows the teaching-learning and assessment-evaluation methods designated for the course unit in relation to the course learning outcomes.)

Contribution of Assesment & Evalution Activities to Final Grade of the Course

Measurement and Evaluation Methods	# of practice per semester	Level of Contribution
Project	3	% 30.00
Midterms	1	% 20.00
Semester Final Exam	1	% 50.00
Total		% 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK		% 50
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK		% 50
Total		% 100

SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE

WORKLOAD OF TEACHING & LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Teaching & Learning Activities	# of Activities per semester	Duration (hour)	Total Workload
Course	14	3	42
Laboratory	0	0	0
Application	0	0	0
Special Course Internship (Work Placement)	0	0	0
Field Work	0	0	0
Study Hours Out of Class	14	4	56
Presentations / Seminar	0	0	0
Project	1	4	4
Homework Assignments	0	0	0
Total Workload of Teaching & Learning Activities	-	-	102
WORKLOAD OF ASSESMENT & EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
Assesment & Evaluation Activities	# of Activities per semester	Duration (hour)	Total Workload
Quizzes	2	4	8
Midterms	1	6	6
Semester Final Exam	1	10	10
Total Workload of Assesment & Evaluation Activities	-	-	24
TOTAL WORKLOAD (Teaching & Learning + Assesment & Evaluation Activities)			126
ECTS CREDITS OF THE COURSE (Total Workload/25.5 h)			5