HOME INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATIONINFORMATION ON DEGREE PROGRAMMES Communication Design and Semiotics (Non-Thesis)CERTIFICATE PROGRAMMESUSEFUL INFORMATION, RESOURCES & SERVICES FOR STUDENTSUSEFUL LINKS AND DOCUMENTSADITIONAL & SUPPORTING INFORMATION

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE

Course Code Course Name Year Semester Theoretical Practical Credit ECTS
70219METOS-ITG0051 Introduction to Semiotics 1 Spring 3 0 3 6
Course Type : Departmental Elective
Cycle: Master      TQF-HE:7. Master`s Degree      QF-EHEA:Second Cycle      EQF-LLL:7. Master`s Degree
Language of Instruction: Turkish
Prerequisities and Co-requisities: N/A
Mode of Delivery: Face to face
Name of Coordinator: Dr. Öğr. Üyesi FÜSUN DENİZ ÖZDEN
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı: Dr. Öğr. Üyesi FÜSUN DENİZ ÖZDEN
Dersin Kategorisi: Field Specific

SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE

Course Objectives & Content

Course Objectives: The aim of this course is to take the basic concepts of linguistics and semiotics, to convey the teachings of semiotics theorists to students and to interpret the systems in higher communication sciences.
Course Content: The content of the course includes the concepts of semiotics, linguistics and semiotics, the relationship between semiotics and communication sciences, types of signs, semiotics theorists and text analysis.

Course Specific Rules

none

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) are those describing the knowledge, skills and competencies that students are expected to achieve upon successful completion of the course. In this context, Course Learning Outcomes defined for this course unit are as follows:
Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.)
  1) He/She defines the concepts and principles of semiotics.
Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.)
  1) He/she learns the history of semiotics and learn the basic concepts of semiotics
Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.)
  1) He/she knows the methods of the leading theorists of the field and interprets the indicators.
  2) He/She knows to create and analyze indicators in the context of communication

Weekly Course Schedule

Week Subject
Materials Sharing *
Related Preparation Further Study
1) Meeting and introduction to the lesson
2) Explanation of the concept and types of indicators
3) Basic semiotic concepts and principles
4) The relationship between system, linguistics and semiotics will be explained.
5) General information about semiotics theorists
6) Ferdinand de Saussure and Linguistics
7) Linguistic Indicator Properties
8) Mid-Term Exam
9) Charles Sanders Peirce Semiotics Theory
10) Roland Barthes My Meaning, Meaning
11) Umberto Eco and Semiotics
12) Analysis types
13) Semiotics and narrative analysis
14) Communication design and semiotics relationship
15) Final Exams
16) Final Exams
*These fields provides students with course materials for their pre- and further study before and after the course delivered.

Recommended or Required Reading & Other Learning Resources/Tools

Course Notes / Textbooks: Öğretim Üyesi ders notları
References: Nükhet Güz, “Etkili İletişim Terimleri Sözlüğü”, İnkilap Kitabevi.
Roland Barthes, “Göstergeler İmparatorluğu”, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, Çev.: Tahsin Yücel
Roland Barthes, “Göstergebilim Serüven”, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, Çev.: Mehmet Rifat, Sema Rifat
Roland Barthes, “Yazının Sıfır Derecesi Yeni Eleştirel Denemeler”, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, Çev.: Tahsin Yücel
Umberto Eco, “Açık Yapıt”, Çev.: Tolga Esmer, Can Yayınları

SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs)

(The matrix below shows how the course learning outcomes (CLOs) associates with programme learning outcomes (both KPLOs & SPLOs) and, if exist, the level of quantitative contribution to them.)

Relationship Between CLOs & PLOs

(KPLOs and SPLOs are the abbreviations for Key & Sub- Programme Learning Outcomes, respectively. )
CLOs/PLOs KPLO 1 KPLO 2 KPLO 3 KPLO 4 KPLO 5
1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6
CLO1
CLO3
CLO3
CLO4

Level of Contribution of the Course to PLOs

No Effect 1 Lowest 2 Low 3 Average 4 High 5 Highest
           
Programme Learning Outcomes Contribution Level (from 1 to 5)
1) Will be able to examine the concepts and theories in semiotics and communication with scientific methods. 4
2) The students can perform the production of visual and / or auditory arts which he / she is interested in effectively using euphorology. 4
3) He/She has aesthetic knowledge and sense. 5
4) Use the theoretical knowledge in scientific research and decision making with efficiency and report the results with an analytical approach. 5
5) In addition to the bachelor level competencies already acquired, s/he acquires the competencies that develop by the expectations of business world and the society defined as the institutional outcomes of our university on the professional level in business and/or academic life. 5

SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE

Teaching & Learning Methods of the Course

(All teaching and learning methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)
Teaching and Learning Methods defined at the Programme Level
Teaching and Learning Methods Defined for the Course
Lectures
Discussion
Case Study
Problem Solving
Demonstration
Views
Laboratory
Reading
Homework
Project Preparation
Thesis Preparation
Peer Education
Seminar
Technical Visit
Course Conference
Brain Storming
Questions Answers
Individual and Group Work
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
Active Participation in Class

Assessment & Evaluation Methods of the Course

(All assessment and evaluation methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)
Aassessment and evaluation Methods defined at the Programme Level
Assessment and Evaluation Methods defined for the Course
Midterm
Presentation
Final Exam
Quiz
Report Evaluation
Homework Evaluation
Oral Exam
Thesis Defense
Jury Evaluation
Practice Exam
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
Active Participation in Class
Participation in Discussions

Relationship Between CLOs & Teaching-Learning, Assesment-Evaluation Methods of the Course

(The matrix below shows the teaching-learning and assessment-evaluation methods designated for the course unit in relation to the course learning outcomes.)
LEARNING & TEACHING METHODS
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
ASSESMENT & EVALUATION METHODS
CLO1 CLO3 CLO3 CLO4
-Lectures -Midterm
-Discussion -Presentation
-Case Study -Final Exam
-Problem Solving -Quiz
-Demonstration -Report Evaluation
-Views -Homework Evaluation
-Laboratory -Oral Exam
-Reading -Thesis Defense
-Homework -Jury Evaluation
-Project Preparation -Practice Exam
-Thesis Preparation -Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
-Peer Education -Active Participation in Class
-Seminar - Participation in Discussions
-Technical Visit
-Course Conference
-Brain Storming
-Questions Answers
-Individual and Group Work
-Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
-Active Participation in Class

Contribution of Assesment & Evalution Activities to Final Grade of the Course

Measurement and Evaluation Methods # of practice per semester Level of Contribution
Quizzes 2 % 20.00
Midterms 1 % 30.00
Semester Final Exam 1 % 50.00
Total % 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK % 50
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK % 50
Total % 100

SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE

WORKLOAD OF TEACHING & LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Teaching & Learning Activities # of Activities per semester Duration (hour) Total Workload
Course 14 3 42
Laboratory 0 0 0
Application 0 0 0
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) 0 0 0
Field Work 0 0 0
Study Hours Out of Class 0 0 0
Presentations / Seminar 0 0 0
Project 0 0 0
Homework Assignments 1 10 10
Total Workload of Teaching & Learning Activities - - 52
WORKLOAD OF ASSESMENT & EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
Assesment & Evaluation Activities # of Activities per semester Duration (hour) Total Workload
Quizzes 1 10 10
Midterms 1 20 20
Semester Final Exam 1 60 60
Total Workload of Assesment & Evaluation Activities - - 90
TOTAL WORKLOAD (Teaching & Learning + Assesment & Evaluation Activities) 142
ECTS CREDITS OF THE COURSE (Total Workload/25.5 h) 6