HOME INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATIONINFORMATION ON DEGREE PROGRAMMES Political Science and International Relations (in English)CERTIFICATE PROGRAMMESUSEFUL INFORMATION, RESOURCES & SERVICES FOR STUDENTSUSEFUL LINKS AND DOCUMENTSADITIONAL & SUPPORTING INFORMATION

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE

Course Code Course Name Year Semester Theoretical Practical Credit ECTS
60223MEEOS-POL0628 Modernity and Its Discontents 4 Spring 3 0 3 5
Course Type : Departmental Elective
Cycle: Bachelor      TQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree      QF-EHEA:First Cycle      EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree
Language of Instruction: English
Prerequisities and Co-requisities: N/A
Mode of Delivery: Face to face
Name of Coordinator: Profesör Dr. UĞUR KÖMEÇOĞLU
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı:
Dersin Kategorisi: Programme Specific

SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE

Course Objectives & Content

Course Objectives: The aim of this course is to help students develop a coherent framework with which to understand what kind of modernity or modern society we live in, what makes it the way it is, and how it shapes our lives. It is intended to help students gain a coherent grasp of transformation since the 19th century onwards and, at the same time, to help them confront in an integrated way, many of the key ideas and controversies in social theory of modernity.
Course Content: By focusing on the major theoretical models, paradigms and central debates of modernity and modern social thought, with an emphasis on diversity of orientations the course surveys the current state of modernity through its dilemmas. Modernity is an allusive concept and like many allusive concepts, it defies any definite explanation. Yet any course on the social theory of modernity and its discontents cannot exclude such figures as Marx, Weber, Freud, Elias, Foucault, Bourdieu, Baudrillard, Derrida and a number of others. Thus, the heart of the course lies in the careful reconstruction and exploration of their complex arguments.

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) are those describing the knowledge, skills and competencies that students are expected to achieve upon successful completion of the course. In this context, Course Learning Outcomes defined for this course unit are as follows:
Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.)
  1) Students will have both ability and capacity to use knowledge and criticisms about social theories on modernity over at least ten thinkers.
Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.)
  1) Students can evaluate major schools of social thought by reflecting on the social world that they are living in.
Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.)
  1) By surveying diverse schools of of social thought, students can develop their own abstract, analytical and interpretive capacities, and can use them in re-thinking and understanding social environment surrounding them.

Weekly Course Schedule

Week Subject
Materials Sharing *
Related Preparation Further Study
1) Some central themes of introductory lecture in short summary form and titles are mass politics and mass society; integration or interplay between social structure and individual experience; social dramaturgy of life, the dialogical and carnivalesque aspects; the growth of capitalism; the social impact of a market economy; the culture of individualism and its dilemmas, western marxism, and challenges to modernity.
2) Symbolic Interactionism 1: George Herbert Mead's and Charles Cooley's approaches to self, mind and society
3) Symbolic Interactionism 2: Dramaturgical Approach of Erving Goffman and modern theatricality in social life
4) Phenomenology and Social Construction of Reality: Alfred Schutz's, Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann's Constructivist Approaches to Modernity
5) Western Marxism and Critical Theory 1: Antonio Gramsci and Louis Althusser's approaches to Modernity
6) Western Marxism and Critical Theory 2: Frankfurt School Thinkers' (Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse, Benjamin) criticisms of Modernity
7) Linguistic Turn, Structuralism and Post-Structuralism 1: Ferdinand de Saussure and Roland Barthes' approaches as compared to Jacques Derrida's deconstructive techniques and criticisms
8)
9) Linguistic Turn, Structuralism and Post-Structuralism 2: Michel Foucault's criticisms towards classical understanding of power & politics, and the problem of identity
10) Figurational Approach to Modernity: Norbert Elias' processual understanding of civilizations in flux.
11) Agency-Structure Integration 1: Pierre Bourdieu's integrative conceptualizations of habitus, practice, field and capital, and his criticsms of paradigmatic dualisms.
12) Agency-Structure Integration 2: Jurgen Habermas' theory of structural transformation of public sphere and the theory of communicative action
13) Challenges/Critiques to Modernism: Postmodernism: J. François Lyotard's, Frederic Jameson's and Jean Baudrillard's approaches to modernism, postmodern condition in art, economy and politics.
14)
*These fields provides students with course materials for their pre- and further study before and after the course delivered.

Recommended or Required Reading & Other Learning Resources/Tools

Course Notes / Textbooks: Temel Kaynaklar - Key Indicative Books:
-Ritzer, George and Stepnisky, Jeffrey; Sociological Theory, tenth edition, 2018, Sage Publications,
-Wallace, Ruth A. and Wolf, Alison; Contemporary Sociological Theory, Prentice Hall.
-Cuff, E.C., Sharrock, W. W. and Francis D.W.; Perspectives in Sociology, Routledge.
References:

SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs)

(The matrix below shows how the course learning outcomes (CLOs) associates with programme learning outcomes (both KPLOs & SPLOs) and, if exist, the level of quantitative contribution to them.)

Relationship Between CLOs & PLOs

(KPLOs and SPLOs are the abbreviations for Key & Sub- Programme Learning Outcomes, respectively. )
CLOs/PLOs KPLO 1 KPLO 2 KPLO 3 KPLO 4 KPLO 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
CLO1
CLO2
CLO3

Level of Contribution of the Course to PLOs

No Effect 1 Lowest 2 Low 3 Average 4 High 5 Highest
           
Programme Learning Outcomes Contribution Level (from 1 to 5)
1) Recognizes different paradigms, fundamental theoretical approaches and methodologies in social sciences,
2) Recognizes individual, social and academic ethic norms. Use their expertise for the public good,
3) Evaluates the issues in the academia and work life with a reflexive viewpoint. Interpret in a sociological way while relating biographical with historical,
4) Applies the theoretical knowledge in business life during a semester.
5) S/he acquires the competencies that develop by the expectations of business world and the society defined as the institutional outcomes of our university on the advanced level in relation with his/her field.

SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE

Teaching & Learning Methods of the Course

(All teaching and learning methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)
Teaching and Learning Methods defined at the Programme Level
Teaching and Learning Methods Defined for the Course
Lectures
Discussion
Case Study
Problem Solving
Demonstration
Views
Laboratory
Reading
Homework
Project Preparation
Thesis Preparation
Peer Education
Seminar
Technical Visit
Course Conference
Brain Storming
Questions Answers
Individual and Group Work
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
Active Participation in Class

Assessment & Evaluation Methods of the Course

(All assessment and evaluation methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)
Aassessment and evaluation Methods defined at the Programme Level
Assessment and Evaluation Methods defined for the Course
Midterm
Presentation
Final Exam
Quiz
Report Evaluation
Homework Evaluation
Oral Exam
Thesis Defense
Jury Evaluation
Practice Exam
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
Active Participation in Class
Participation in Discussions

Relationship Between CLOs & Teaching-Learning, Assesment-Evaluation Methods of the Course

(The matrix below shows the teaching-learning and assessment-evaluation methods designated for the course unit in relation to the course learning outcomes.)
LEARNING & TEACHING METHODS
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
ASSESMENT & EVALUATION METHODS
CLO1 CLO2 CLO3
-Lectures -Midterm
-Discussion -Presentation
-Case Study -Final Exam
-Problem Solving -Quiz
-Demonstration -Report Evaluation
-Views -Homework Evaluation
-Laboratory -Oral Exam
-Reading -Thesis Defense
-Homework -Jury Evaluation
-Project Preparation -Practice Exam
-Thesis Preparation -Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
-Peer Education -Active Participation in Class
-Seminar - Participation in Discussions
-Technical Visit
-Course Conference
-Brain Storming
-Questions Answers
-Individual and Group Work
-Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
-Active Participation in Class

Contribution of Assesment & Evalution Activities to Final Grade of the Course

Measurement and Evaluation Methods # of practice per semester Level of Contribution
Quizzes 2 % 20.00
Midterms 1 % 30.00
Semester Final Exam 1 % 50.00
Total % 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK % 50
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK % 50
Total % 100

SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE

WORKLOAD OF TEACHING & LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Teaching & Learning Activities # of Activities per semester Duration (hour) Total Workload
Course 14 3 42
Laboratory 0 0 0
Application 0 0 0
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) 0 0 0
Field Work 0 0 0
Study Hours Out of Class 10 4 40
Presentations / Seminar 1 10 10
Project 0 0 0
Homework Assignments 6 4 24
Total Workload of Teaching & Learning Activities - - 116
WORKLOAD OF ASSESMENT & EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
Assesment & Evaluation Activities # of Activities per semester Duration (hour) Total Workload
Quizzes 2 3 6
Midterms 1 3 3
Semester Final Exam 1 3 3
Total Workload of Assesment & Evaluation Activities - - 12
TOTAL WORKLOAD (Teaching & Learning + Assesment & Evaluation Activities) 128
ECTS CREDITS OF THE COURSE (Total Workload/25.5 h) 5