SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE

Course Code	Course Name	Year	Semester	Theoretical	Practical	Credit	ECTS
70229METOS-ITG0122	Cultural Management and Policies	0	Spring	3	0	3	6

Course Type :	Departmental Elective
Cycle:	Master      TQF-HE:7. Master`s Degree      QF-EHEA:Second Cycle      EQF-LLL:7. Master`s Degree
Language of Instruction:	Turkish
Prerequisities and Co-requisities:	N/A
Mode of Delivery:	E-Learning
Name of Coordinator:	Profesör Dr. AYŞEGÜL GÜÇHAN
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı:	Profesör Dr. AYŞEGÜL GÜÇHAN
Dersin Kategorisi:

SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE

Course Objectives & Content

Course Objectives:	This course aims to provide students with information about the way cultural sphere works.
Course Content:	This course analyze each actor of the cultural sphere.

Course Specific Rules

None

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) are those describing the knowledge, skills and competencies that students are expected to achieve upon successful completion of the course. In this context, Course Learning Outcomes defined for this course unit are as follows:

Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.)

1) At the end of this course students are able to learn cultural management.

Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.)

Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.)

Weekly Course Schedule

Week	Subject	Materials Sharing *
		Related Preparation	Further Study

*These fields provides students with course materials for their pre- and further study before and after the course delivered.

Recommended or Required Reading & Other Learning Resources/Tools

Course Notes / Textbooks:

- Becker, H. S. (2008). Art worlds. Univ of California Press. - Becker, H. S. (2013). Sanat Dünyaları. (E. Yılmaz, Çev). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. - Bourdieu, P., Darbel, A., & Scnapper, D. (1990). The love of art: European art museums and their public. - Doherty, C. (2004). The institution is dead! Long live the instituti Contemporary Art and New Institutionalism. Engage Review Art of Encounter,15. - Edson, G. (2204). Museum Management. Running a museum (pp. 133-1 ICOM. - Goodwin, J. (Ed.) (2008). The international art markets: the essential guide for collectors and investors. Kogan Page Limited. - Grampp, W. D. (198 Pricing the priceless: art, artists, and economics. Basic Books. - Grenfell, M., & Hardy, C. (2007). Art rules: Pierre Bourdieu and the visual arts. Berg. - Shine (2001). The invention of art: A cultural history. University of Chicago Press. (Chapter VI). - Shiner, L. (2010). Sanatın icadı: bir kültür tarihi. (İ. Türkmen, Çev). Yayınları. - Stallabrass, J. (2004). Art incorporated: The story of contemporary art. Oxford University Press, USA. - Tanner, J. (Ed.). (2004). The social produc art. Sociology of Art: A Reader (pp. 69-76). Routledge. - Thompson, D. (2009). The $12 million stuffed shark: The curious economics of contemporary art. A Canada. - Zolberg, V. L. (1990). Constructing a Sociology of the Arts. Cambridge University Press. - Zolberg, V. L. (1990). Bir Sanat Sosyolojisi Oluşturmak. Özbay, Çev). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.

References:

Zolberg, V. L. (1990). Bir Sanat Sosyolojisi Oluşturmak. Özbay, Çev). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.

SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs)

(The matrix below shows how the course learning outcomes (CLOs) associates with programme learning outcomes (both KPLOs & SPLOs) and, if exist, the level of quantitative contribution to them.)

Relationship Between CLOs & PLOs

(KPLOs and SPLOs are the abbreviations for Key & Sub- Programme Learning Outcomes, respectively. )

CLOs/PLOs
CLO1

Level of Contribution of the Course to PLOs

No Effect	1 Lowest	2 Low	3 Average	4 High	5 Highest

Programme Learning Outcomes

Contribution Level (from 1 to 5)

SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE

Teaching & Learning Methods of the Course

(All teaching and learning methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)

Teaching and Learning Methods defined at the Programme Level	Teaching and Learning Methods Defined for the Course
Lectures
Discussion
Case Study
Problem Solving
Demonstration
Views
Laboratory
Reading
Homework
Project Preparation
Thesis Preparation
Peer Education
Seminar
Technical Visit
Course Conference
Brain Storming
Questions Answers
Individual and Group Work
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
Active Participation in Class

Assessment & Evaluation Methods of the Course

(All assessment and evaluation methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)

Aassessment and evaluation Methods defined at the Programme Level	Assessment and Evaluation Methods defined for the Course
Midterm
Presentation
Final Exam
Quiz
Report Evaluation
Homework Evaluation
Oral Exam
Thesis Defense
Jury Evaluation
Practice Exam
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
Active Participation in Class
Participation in Discussions

Relationship Between CLOs & Teaching-Learning, Assesment-Evaluation Methods of the Course

(The matrix below shows the teaching-learning and assessment-evaluation methods designated for the course unit in relation to the course learning outcomes.)

Contribution of Assesment & Evalution Activities to Final Grade of the Course

Measurement and Evaluation Methods	# of practice per semester	Level of Contribution
Quizzes	2	% 20.00
Midterms	1	% 30.00
Semester Final Exam	1	% 50.00
Total		% 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK		% 50
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK		% 50
Total		% 100

SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE